Welcome Guest Sign up! | Login  

 
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
SilverDolly51Offline



Joined: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 1979
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 09, 2009 - 01:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I love those ugly british planes! Very Happy
Gotta love the Boulton Paul Defiant turret style, too! Smile

_________________
Image
iMac 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2 Gb RAM
320 Gb HD
Ati Radeon HD 2600 PRO
OS 10.5.8
Logitech Wingman Force 3D
CH Pro Pedals
View user's profile Send private message
PoOffline



Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Posts: 1455
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 09, 2009 - 02:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I think both are bloody well gorgeous. Very Happy

Well its also not just an turret styled like an Boulton Paul turret it actually is one. I also love how you can see the spin parachutes rip chord going along the Roc's fueslage from just under the pilot to the tail. Also love how the canopy between the pilot and turret and the sticking up part at the top of the rear fuselage behind the turret could be raised to reduce drag and then lowered when the guns had to be used. Also the pilot even though having no fixed guns himself still had an trigger on his spade grip as the turret could be fixed forward and fired by him.

_________________
Commanding Officer in 806 Naval Air Squadron, Lieutenant Commander Mark John "Po" Oliver RNVR
806 Naval Air Squadron Are Recruiting - Click To Find Out More
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
M_SabataOffline



Joined: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 1741
Location: Austin, Texas, US of A
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 09, 2009 - 08:45 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I like the fixed turret idea... very cool...

_________________
Image
"Once you go Mac, you don't go back"
View user's profile Send private message
CavemanOffline



Joined: Aug 26, 2006
Posts: 540

Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 10, 2009 - 05:51 AM Reply with quote Back to top

That sounds terrifying! It would be like being shot at, having bullets whipping by past your head. I wonder how they managed the interrupter gearing for that!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
BatOffline



Joined: Jun 22, 2007
Posts: 185
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 10, 2009 - 01:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top

SilverDolly51 wrote:
I love those ugly british planes! Very Happy
Gotta love the Boulton Paul Defiant turret style, too! Smile


Yeah! Very Happy
That's what's really desappointing with british plane-designers. It's hard to believe that the same country poduced the Blackburn Skua AND the Spitfire, the Hampden AND the Mosquito, the Bristol Brigand AND the tempest, and so on! No golden mean! Just ugliests and prettiests planes in aviation history (no less)! Wink Look for example to USAAF or Luftwaffe: sure, they had some missed planes, but on an aesthetic point of view, most are close of a "general mean". For british planes, looks like it's just the opposite!

_________________
http://target4today.co.uk/
Image
View user's profile Send private message
PoOffline



Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Posts: 1455
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 10, 2009 - 02:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I had not thought about that the bullets would have to go through the airscrew Caveman. I assume maybe it did have an interupter gear also then should it have to be fired forward. Boulton Paul turrets and others did have interupter gears themselves in order to stop the gun firing when the guns would be aiming at the tail and such. Fixed turret idea is I think just an modification that could be made whilst on the ground by the way Sabata not an flick an switch there pilot has control whilst in the air sorta affair.

Bah Bat... Nonsense...

_________________
Commanding Officer in 806 Naval Air Squadron, Lieutenant Commander Mark John "Po" Oliver RNVR
806 Naval Air Squadron Are Recruiting - Click To Find Out More
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
perilOffline



Joined: Aug 03, 2003
Posts: 6179

Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 10, 2009 - 03:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top

Yeah, that P38 is so "general mean"?? NOT! Wink

_________________
Peril

http://targetrabaul.org
http://perilvraaf.wordpress.com/

CORE 2 DUO E6600 2.4 GHZ
2G DDR 2, 667MHZ LEMEL
GF GTX260
CH Fighterstick USB
Perils Pedals (Analogue rudder pedals)
View user's profile Send private message
M_SabataOffline



Joined: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 1741
Location: Austin, Texas, US of A
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 10, 2009 - 06:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top

Maybe it's just that other countries either made good or mediocre planes, while the RAF had good or just BAD planes Wink Laughing

_________________
Image
"Once you go Mac, you don't go back"
View user's profile Send private message
SilverDolly51Offline



Joined: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 1979
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 04:52 AM Reply with quote Back to top

And the few good planes they produced became world famous... Laughing
'oh my god, those brits FINALLY made something airworthy *utter shock* Laughing Mr. Green '

Razz

_________________
Image
iMac 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2 Gb RAM
320 Gb HD
Ati Radeon HD 2600 PRO
OS 10.5.8
Logitech Wingman Force 3D
CH Pro Pedals
View user's profile Send private message
perilOffline



Joined: Aug 03, 2003
Posts: 6179

Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 05:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top

And the Japanese? Leaders in their field in 1940, good designers as well, just peaked a bit early Wink

_________________
Peril

http://targetrabaul.org
http://perilvraaf.wordpress.com/

CORE 2 DUO E6600 2.4 GHZ
2G DDR 2, 667MHZ LEMEL
GF GTX260
CH Fighterstick USB
Perils Pedals (Analogue rudder pedals)
View user's profile Send private message
Bomber



Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 6103
Location: Nottingham, England
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 05:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top

Could it be, and I know it's a wild guess here... that the RAF were playing 'catch-up' in the arms build-up or once the war started, had the the thought that asthetic considerations were secondary to killing Germans ?

Good enough is good enough

Simon

_________________
http://target4today.co.uk/

Image

'Just Jane'
Brought to you in association with
http://www.lincsaviation.co.uk/home.cfm
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
StiglrOffline



Joined: Aug 03, 2003
Posts: 11418
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 11:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top

Good enough, however, was also Blenheims, Battles, Beauforts and other truly wretched planes.... Wink

_________________
Windows XP Professional
Athlon 1700+ 1.4GHz
Mobo: FIC AU13 TFA42 BIOS
Allegro sound card
2GB of 2700 DDR memory
Video Card: EVGA 6200 512MB with 6.14.11.8208 drivers
Cougar HOTAS
CH Pedals
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
rigamortisOffline



Joined: Oct 11, 2009
Posts: 538

Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 03:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top

It mirrors their car design almost perfectly LOL. You get some very beautiful cars and some totally crap ones. There was actually a Bristol Blenheim car and take a look at the Standard Vanguard phase II. I can remember the 3-wheel cars running around Yorkshire as a kid too.

_________________
Intel(R) Core (TM) CPU
X6800 @2.93GHz
2 GB RAM
Microsoft XP Pro 32 bit SP3
Nvidia GeForce 7950GT in SLI
Viewsonic VG2030WM
(Alienware used to be good, now DELL owns it).
View user's profile Send private message
PoOffline



Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Posts: 1455
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 03:53 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I don't think any British machines used in World War Two are ugly really. I think they are all either bloody gorgeous or average. Alright the Handley Page Hampden does look somewhat odd in some pictures but in others it looks rather nice. It makes me think it looks like an cross between an Armstrong Whitworth Whitley (tail) and an Bristol Beaufort (turret and forward) even though really it's tail doesn't look that much like an Whitleys.

Image

Image

Image

Although I possibly have an rather warped and biased view on them. My way in being patriotic rather than rootin us in sports. Laughing

_________________
Commanding Officer in 806 Naval Air Squadron, Lieutenant Commander Mark John "Po" Oliver RNVR
806 Naval Air Squadron Are Recruiting - Click To Find Out More
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
StiglrOffline



Joined: Aug 03, 2003
Posts: 11418
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 04:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top

Hampden would be nice to have for early war, wouldn't it?

Riga, you're looking for a subject for your first efforts, aren't you? Well, then..... Smile

_________________
Windows XP Professional
Athlon 1700+ 1.4GHz
Mobo: FIC AU13 TFA42 BIOS
Allegro sound card
2GB of 2700 DDR memory
Video Card: EVGA 6200 512MB with 6.14.11.8208 drivers
Cougar HOTAS
CH Pedals
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Bomber



Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 6103
Location: Nottingham, England
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 05:00 PM Reply with quote Back to top

Hollywood

Pretty rather than practical.

The M16 rather than the ak47

Maybe if the US had had an ugly gun they'd not have lost in Veitnam..

Thankfully the RAF chose the Lancaster rather than the B17, or there'd have been no free Britain from which to stage an invasion once the US had decided to join in.

_________________
http://target4today.co.uk/

Image

'Just Jane'
Brought to you in association with
http://www.lincsaviation.co.uk/home.cfm
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
StiglrOffline



Joined: Aug 03, 2003
Posts: 11418
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 07:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top

Well, certainly nobody's suggesting Lancs were ugly....

_________________
Windows XP Professional
Athlon 1700+ 1.4GHz
Mobo: FIC AU13 TFA42 BIOS
Allegro sound card
2GB of 2700 DDR memory
Video Card: EVGA 6200 512MB with 6.14.11.8208 drivers
Cougar HOTAS
CH Pedals
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
M_SabataOffline



Joined: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 1741
Location: Austin, Texas, US of A
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 10:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top

To me, it seems that Japanese aircraft designers got stuck up, and couldn't recover once the US caught up (same sort of thing for germany no? They were kinda using the same planes throughout the war). Actually, the US started the war stuck up, but they could afford to pay for it... so don't get stuck up Wink

Late war JP planes were pretty good all-around, they just lost quality as the bombs started falling.

_________________
Image
"Once you go Mac, you don't go back"
View user's profile Send private message
mekgpOffline



Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 2410
Location: ...Parked...
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 11:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top

OH bloody hell... Rolling Eyes

Second topic: Hampden? why, its a cross between a Beau and a Do17! Wink

_________________
Skype @ always.mekgp
Image
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
PoOffline



Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Posts: 1455
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 10:06 AM Reply with quote Back to top

Simon wrote:
Hollywood

Pretty rather than practical.

The M16 rather than the ak47

Maybe if the US had had an ugly gun they'd not have lost in Veitnam..

Thankfully the RAF chose the Lancaster rather than the B17, or there'd have been no free Britain from which to stage an invasion once the US had decided to join in.


I rather don't believe the M16 was the sole reason in the failure in Vietnam. Various reasons. Would have been won with Aussies only I reckon only had the Aussie public been not against the war either.

Also Avro Lancasters starting coming into units in 1942 I believe? So I think it could claim to being an machine which ensured that Germany did not get back to strength and manage to start to think about attempting another invasion but in helping to stop the first invasion belongs to the Spitfires, Hurricanes, Defiants, Blenheims, Hampdens, Whitleys, Gladiators, Skuas, Rocs, Wellingtons, Swordfishs, Beauforts, Battles, Manchesters and such.

_________________
Commanding Officer in 806 Naval Air Squadron, Lieutenant Commander Mark John "Po" Oliver RNVR
806 Naval Air Squadron Are Recruiting - Click To Find Out More
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
SilverDolly51Offline



Joined: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 1979
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 01:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I agree with Bomber, effectiveness comes before estethics. But even then, there are some really weird british planes that, aerodynamically, don't make any sence.

But because they are ugly, I kind of like 'em too. I mean, take that Hampdon for instance... If I would be a crewmember, I would be really really proud of it. it's a bit of an underdog position.

These are some of my favourite (lesser known) british planes (some being quite odd):
Image
Image
Image
Image

And my absolute favourite:
Image

_________________
Image
iMac 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2 Gb RAM
320 Gb HD
Ati Radeon HD 2600 PRO
OS 10.5.8
Logitech Wingman Force 3D
CH Pro Pedals
View user's profile Send private message
PoOffline



Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Posts: 1455
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 01:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top

Very Happy

Westland Whirlwind; Fairey Firefly; Fairey Albacore; Vickers Wellesley; De Havilland Sea Hornet.

_________________
Commanding Officer in 806 Naval Air Squadron, Lieutenant Commander Mark John "Po" Oliver RNVR
806 Naval Air Squadron Are Recruiting - Click To Find Out More
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
BatOffline



Joined: Jun 22, 2007
Posts: 185
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 02:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top

I always found the DH Sea Hornet a really well-designed plane if we consider the aesthetic question! Very Happy
A French comics artist, Francis Bergèse, who adaptated in comic strips the adventudes of Bigglesworth (due to W.E. Johns) was inspired by it for an wonderful RAF fictionnal prototype, successor of the Mosquito: the "Spur", purchasing another fictionnal protoypes: the german "Renkell".

Image
Image

_________________
http://target4today.co.uk/
Image
View user's profile Send private message
SilverDolly51Offline



Joined: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 1979
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 03:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top

hehe Po... a connaiseur too Wink Very Happy

@ Bat: I love Bergèse's comics! Very Happy The way he can draw an aeroplane! Shocked WOOF! Very Happy

_________________
Image
iMac 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2 Gb RAM
320 Gb HD
Ati Radeon HD 2600 PRO
OS 10.5.8
Logitech Wingman Force 3D
CH Pro Pedals
View user's profile Send private message
luminoOffline



Joined: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 2964

Status: Offline
Post   Posted: Nov 16, 2009 - 05:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top

SilverDolly51 wrote:

These are some of my favourite (lesser known) british planes (some being quite odd):
Image


the whirlwind reminds me of another plane with a heavy nose armament...
Image

SilverDolly51 wrote:

And my absolute favourite:
Image

aerodynamic principles are the same for every country:
Image

_________________
Image
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  


All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Powered by PNphpBB2 1.2a © 2003 PNphpBB Group
Credits